Criterion I: Curricular Aspects
Key Indicator 1.1 Curricular Planning And Implementation
Key Indicator 1.2 Academic Flexibility
Metric 1.2.1:Number of elective/options courses offered by the institution during followed during last five years.
Key Indicator 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment
Metric 1.3.1: Institution integrates cross-cutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, constitutional and Human Values, Environment &Sustainability and other value framework enshrined in Sustainable
Development goals into the Curriculum.
Metric 1.3.2: Percentage of courses that include experiential learning through Moot Courts, seminar courses, Court visits, Arbitration/Mediation/Client Counseling Exercises, Para legal volunteering/ legal aid training, advocate chamber and internship in law firms/NGOs/Judicial Clerkships etc. during last five years.
Metric 1.3.3: Percentage of students undertaking Mediation/Client Counseling Exercises, and internship in law firms/NGOs/Judicial Clerkships etc. Percentage of students undertaking Mediation/Client Counseling Exercises, and internship in law firms/NGOs/Judicial Clerkships etc.
Metric 1.3.4: Number of certificate / value-added courses / Diploma Programmes offered by the institutions and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM / e_Pathshala/ NPTEL and other recognized platforms where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed
Key Indicator 1.4 Feedback System
Metric 1.4.1: Structured feedback for curriculum and its transactions is regularly obtained from stakeholders like Students, Teachers, Law firms, Judges, Sr. Counsels, Employers, Alumni, Civil Societies, Academic peers etc.
Criterion II: Teaching, Learning, and Evaluation
Key Indicator 2.1 Student Enrolment And Profile
Key Indicator 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
Metric 2.2.1: The institution recognises multiple intelligences of students and creates policies and programs for all kinds of learners. The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes /policies for different levels of learners
Metric 2.2.2: Student- Full time teacher ratio
Key Indicator 2.3 Teaching Learning Process
Metric 2.3.1: Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process
Metric 2.3.2: The institution adopts effective schemes for mentoring students through teacher mentors and student mentors to address academics and student-psychological issues.
Key Indicator 2.4 Teacher Profile And Quality
Metric 2.4.1: Percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts.
Metric 2.4.2: Percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D./L.L.D. during the last five years
Metric 2.4.3: Average teaching experience of full time teachers
Metric 2.4.4: Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution throughout during the last five years
Key Indicator 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
Metric 2.5.1: Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency , mode and innovation along with prevalence of mechanisms to deal with internal exam related grievances which is transparent and time-bound.
Key Indicator 2.6 Student Performance And Learning Outcome
Metric 2.6.1: The institution has stated learning outcomes (Program and Course outcomes)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution
Metric 2.6.2: Pass percentage of Students during last five years
Key Indicator 2.7 Student Statisfaction Survey
Metric 2.7.1: Student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process
Criterion III: Research, Innovation, and Extensions
Key Indicator 3.1 Resource Mobalization For Research
Metric 3.1.1: Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years
Metric 3.1.2: Seminars/conferences/workshops conducted by the institution on Research methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Entrepreneurship, Skill development, Frontier/ contemporary areas researches in law and judicial trends etc. during the last five years
Metric 3.1.3: Funded Seminars/ Conferences /workshops
Key Indicator 3.2 Research Publication And Awards
Metric 3.2.1: Percentage of teachers recognized as research guides.
Metric 3.2.2: Number of papers published per teacher in the Journals notified on UGC website during the last five years
Metric 3.2.3: Number of books and chapters in edited volumes/books published and papers published in national/ international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
Key Indicator 3.3 Extension Activites
Metric 3.3.1: Institution’s Legal aid/community services and Outcomes of extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues, holistic development, and awards received,
Metric 3.3.2: Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through NSS/NCC/Government and non-government bodies other clubs during the last five years
Metric 3.3.3: Students participating in Lokadaalat/Para Legal Volunteering/Pro-bono, PIL etc and the outcomes are evident.
Key Indicator 3.4 Collaboration
Metric 3.4.1: Number of functional MoUs / linkages with institutions/ Law firms/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years.
Criterion IV: Infrastructure and Learning Resources
Key Indicator 4.1 Physical Facilities
Metric 4.1.1: The Institution has adequate infrastructure facilities for a. teaching – learning, viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment etc b. ICT – enabled facilities such as smart class, LMS etc. Facilities for Cultural and sports activities, yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor), Gymnasium, auditorium etc
Metric 4.1.2: Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years
Key Indicator 4.2 Library as a Learning resource
Metric 4.2.1: Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students
Metric 4.2.2: Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e- journals and legal databases during the last five years
Key Indicator 4.3 IT Infrastrutcure
Key Indicator 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
Metric 4.4.1: Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years
4.4.2: There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities – laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc.
Criterion V: Student Support and Progression
Key Indicator 5.1 Student Support
Metric 5.1.1: Percentage of students benefited by scholarships /freeships by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years
Metric 5.1.2: Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution
Metric 5.1.3: Efforts taken by the institution to provide career counseling including e-counseling and guidance for competitive examinations during the last five years.
Metric 5.1.4: The Institution has a transparent mechanism for timely redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
Key Indicator 5.2 Student Progression
Metric 5.2.1: Percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years
Metric 5.2.2: Percentage of Students enrolled with State Bar council.
Metric 5.2.3: Percentage of students progressing to higher education during the last five years
Metric 5.2.4: Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years
Key Indicator 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
Metric 5.3.1: Number of awards/medals won by students for outstanding performance in sports/literary/cultural activities/Moot court/arbitration competition/ Client counseling competition/Trail advocacy/Mediation and negotiation competition/ Judgment writing competitions/Legislative drafting Competition.
Metric 5.3.2: Institution facilitates students’ representation and engagement in various administrative, cocurricular and extracurricular activities
Metric 5.3.3: The institution conducts /organizes following activities 1. Sports competitions/events 2.Cultural competitions/events 3. Technical fest/academic fests 4. Any other events through active clubs and forums
Key Indicator 5.4 Alumni Engagement
Metric 5.4.1: The Alumni Association/Chapters (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and teaching, mentoring other support services during the last five years.
Metric 5.4.2: Alumni contribution during the last five years
Criterion VI: Governance, Leadership, and Management
Key Indicator 6.1 Institutional Vision and leadership
Metric 6.1.1: The Alumni Association/Chapters (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and teaching, mentoring other support services during the last five years.
Metric 6.1.2: The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management.
Key Indicator 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
Metric 6.2.1: The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
Metric 6.2.2: The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
Metric 6.2.3: Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1.Administration 2.Finance and Accounts 3.Student Admission and Support 4.Examination
Key Indicator 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
Metric 6.3.1: The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff.
Metric 6.3.2: Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies publication and other academic incentives during the last five years.
Metric 6.3.3: Percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years
Metric 6.3.4: Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff.
Key Indicator 6.4 Faculty Management and Resource Mobilization
Metric 6.4.1: Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly.
Metric 6.4.2: Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years.
Metric 6.4.3: Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources.
Key Indicator 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance Sysytem
Metric 6.5.1: Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes
Metric 6.5.2: The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities.
Metric 6.5.3: Quality assurance initiatives of the institution
Criterion VII: Institutional Values and Best Practices
Key Indicator 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
Metric 7.1.1: Institution has initiated Gender audit and measure for the promotion of gender equity
Metric 7.1.2: The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures
Metric 7.1.3: Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of degradable and non-degradable waste
Metric 7.1.4: Water conservation facilities available in the Institution
Metric 7.1.5: Green campus initiatives
Metric 7.1.6: Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution
Metric 7.1.7: The Institution has Differently-abled (Divyangjan) friendly, barrier free environment
Metric 7.1.8: The Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal, socio-economic and such other diversities
Metric 7.1.9: Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens
Metric 7.1.10: The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff
Key Indicator 7.2 Best Practices
Metric 7.2.1: Two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution
Key Indicator 7.3 Institutional distinctiveness
Metric 7.3.1: Performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within